Subscribe to Hydrapinion RSS 2.0 feed Subscribe to Hydrapinion

Recent Posts

10 comments

Comment from: David Hague [Visitor]
I just placed a PayWall into AusCam Online (selected stories at $1 each via PayPal or subscribe for a year for $39.95).

As a publisher, I identify that not all stories should be 'free' as, as you say Ian, quality journalism, investigation, testing etc has to be worth something. A fluff piece is a different story.

This is the future to ensure that we not only continue to exist, but also produce quality words.

Thanks for pointing that fact out!
30/03/10 @ 03:24
Comment from: MNPundit [Visitor]
Your use of "quality" in the same sentence as "Murdoch" is pretty funny
30/03/10 @ 06:17
Comment from: John Hope [Visitor]
Are you kidding ? Murdoch and NC are fucked . The Times and Sunday Times are just The Sun with more words - the same celebrity crap ; the journalism is poor, has nothing to say, there are no insights . If I want insight I go to the best blog the Daily Dish . And Andrew Sullivan is a Sunday Times columnist , but an exception where quality is concerned . I stood waiting for a train recently . Not one person was reading a newspaper, but virtually all were holding a mobile phone. Says it all really. Murdoch should just fade away before he becomes completely irrelevant in a year or two .
30/03/10 @ 07:30
Comment from: Stephen WITHERS [Member] Email
"While it's unlikely anyone will pay for celebrity gossip and coverage of breaking events, quality journalism is a very different deal."

Isn't a large part of the problem that not enough people are prepared to pay for quality journalism?

"papers work because they bring multiple elements into a single, easily digestable whole."

This is exactly why I still buy newspapers. The trouble with online content is that you tend to read only stories that match your immediate interests and prejudices. With print, the eye travels over every page and you're more likely to read or at least become aware of a broader range of news and opinions.

"Having a slickly presented package of news delivered to such a device will be so compelling people will pay for it."

Only if it's substantially cheaper than the print edition. I for one won't be spending (say) $7 for the electronic version of a magazine.
30/03/10 @ 14:13
Comment from: Stephen WITHERS [Member] Email
@John Hope: "Not one person was reading a newspaper, but virtually all were holding a mobile phone."

Isn't that an argument in favour of newspaper charging for access to electronic versions?
30/03/10 @ 14:16
Comment from: cheap mbt shoes [Visitor]
Thanks to share this information
07/04/10 @ 19:04
Comment from: mbt shoes [Visitor]
Excellent list! I've learned more from this forum in about 2 days than I have at any other forum community.
16/04/10 @ 17:48
Comment from: chloe boots [Visitor]
HaHA! I have already seen the great thing!!!
30/04/10 @ 15:34
Comment from: design website for mobile device [Visitor]
Hi, I have been reading this blog for some time now but never bothered to comment until today. Wanted to let you know that I am a fan and enjoy your work. Thanks
24/05/10 @ 16:03
Comment from: design website for mobile device [Visitor]
Did you write this yourself? Very fascinating, either way. Couldn't agree me -- enjoy visiting your site, Thanks for your site and post - really like this one! Professional article - enjoy your site! Good information. Keep up the good work. I could not have said it better!
01/06/10 @ 19:37