Firefox 3 inflames the browser wars,
but why should we care?
By Ian GRAYSON
The rekindled web browser battle will crank up a notch this week with the release of Firefox 3.0, but I just can’t muster any excitement I’m afraid.
To me, web browsers are like operating systems – the sooner we don’t have to care about them the better. The day they just sit in the background and let us do what we need to do, quickly and efficiently, will be a happy day indeed.

Now don’t get me wrong, I’m not saying a good web browser is unimportant. I just believe it should do its job invisibly - acting as a window to the online content and services I want. And that’s about it.
Just as I don’t spend a lot of time thinking about the version of firmware that runs my car engine’s management systems, I don’t want to invest a lot of brain power pondering browsers. They should just be slick, reliable and secure.
Of course, the reason Firefox is getting such attention is because its primary rival, Microsoft’s Internet Explorer, is none of these things. It’s bloated, prone to unexpected crashes, and has security holes you could put your fist through.
As a result Firefox is enjoying rapidly growing popularity. According to some industry estimates it’s already captured a worldwide market share of some 17 per cent and the new version should push this even higher.
This is great news as any market benefits from competition and it might cause Microsoft to lift its game and create a browser that’s actually up to the task. We can but hope.
Meantime, if you’re yet to give Firefox a try, let the release of version 3.0 be a reason you do. According to preliminary reports, it’s faster and more user friendly than IE, and less likely to suddenly shut down just as you’re checking a bank balance or entering data into a corporate database.
But, like me, also look forward to the day when you won’t have to think or care what browser you’re using. It will just work, so you can get on and do whatever it is you need to do. Hopefully that day is not too far away.
Subscribe to Hydrapinion
|
|
Recent Posts
Trackback address for this post
Trackback URL (right click and copy shortcut/link location)
3 comments
In reality Google has had it correct from the beginning. A person wants simplicity and function. If we want extra gadgets then we will add them ourselves. This brings us back to why Firefox does so well with users of its browser. They keep it simple and allow developers to make add-ons if we want extra function.
Couldn't you say that about *any* software? That you don't want to think about it?
And hasn't Firefox been instrumental in raising the importance of open standards. so that you will not have to care about which browser you are using?
So that you can just ignore your browser, we have to code sites one way for IE and a second for every other browser. Whether we do that as mirror sites, or a complex combination of single site work-arounds the result is the same; our development time is doubled and you ultimately pay for it.
Subscribe to Hydrapinion
Ian Grayson has been a technology journalist for more than 15 years. A former IT editor of The Australian newspaper, he now runs his own freelance business, crafting stories for a range of publications and web sites. He is intrigued by the power that technology wields in the world of work - both for better and for worse - and in this blog offers insights into what it all might mean.