<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1"?><!-- generator="b2evolution/4.1.6" -->
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<title>Play - Latest Comments on iiNet victory is worthless if secret copyright treaty is signed</title>
		<link>http://www.hydrapinion.com/index.php/play/?disp=comments</link>
		<atom:link rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="http://www.hydrapinion.com/index.php/play/?tempskin=_rss2&#38;disp=comments&#38;p=937" />
		<description></description>
		<language>en-AU</language>
		<docs>http://backend.userland.com/rss</docs>
		<admin:generatorAgent rdf:resource="http://b2evolution.net/?v=4.1.6"/>
		<ttl>60</ttl>
		<item>
			<title>Adam TURNER [Member] in response to: iiNet victory is worthless if secret copyright treaty is signed</title>
			<pubDate>Fri, 05 Feb 2010 01:50:45 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>Adam TURNER [Member]</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">c990@http://www.hydrapinion.com/</guid>
			<description>Thanks Brett, but considering how reluctant they are to share the details of the treaty, I don&#039;t think I&#039;ll take the Feds&#039; word on it.</description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[Thanks Brett, but considering how reluctant they are to share the details of the treaty, I don't think I'll take the Feds' word on it.]]></content:encoded>
			<link>http://www.hydrapinion.com/index.php/play/2010/02/05/iinet-victory-is-worthless-if-secret-copyright-treaty-is-signed#c990</link>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title> Brett [Visitor] in response to: iiNet victory is worthless if secret copyright treaty is signed</title>
			<pubDate>Fri, 05 Feb 2010 01:14:26 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>Brett [Visitor]</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">c989@http://www.hydrapinion.com/</guid>
			<description>Adam - I was equally concerned by ACTA. &lt;br /&gt;
The Feds have assured us that &#039;three strikes&#039; was never on the table at the Mexico talks, or at least not in front of the Australian delegation. See - http://bit.ly/cBxoA8&lt;br /&gt;</description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[Adam - I was equally concerned by ACTA. <br />
The Feds have assured us that 'three strikes' was never on the table at the Mexico talks, or at least not in front of the Australian delegation. See - http://bit.ly/cBxoA8<br />]]></content:encoded>
			<link>http://www.hydrapinion.com/index.php/play/2010/02/05/iinet-victory-is-worthless-if-secret-copyright-treaty-is-signed#c989</link>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title> Igor Zevaka [Visitor] in response to: iiNet victory is worthless if secret copyright treaty is signed</title>
			<pubDate>Thu, 04 Feb 2010 23:12:01 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>Igor Zevaka [Visitor]</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">c987@http://www.hydrapinion.com/</guid>
			<description>AFACT lost the &#039;F&#039; to become ACTA whilst everyone hopes they get &#039;F&#039;-ing lost.</description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[AFACT lost the 'F' to become ACTA whilst everyone hopes they get 'F'-ing lost.]]></content:encoded>
			<link>http://www.hydrapinion.com/index.php/play/2010/02/05/iinet-victory-is-worthless-if-secret-copyright-treaty-is-signed#c987</link>
		</item>
			</channel>
</rss>
