Smartphone or Netbook?
By Alex KIDMAN
[Sitting in for Anthony Caruana]
All this year, the battle for portable computing has rested with two similar but distinct technology products. The Smartphone (most notably Apple's iPhone 3G, but also Blackberry and HTC's offerings) and the Netbook - a category so owned by Asus that every single Netbook reviewed this year's been compared to the ever-expanding Eee line.
The choice between the two hasn't just focused on whether or not you can stuff it in your pocket or bag, however. For the record, most of the time I lug around both - at the moment it's been either an iPhone 3G or Blackberry Storm (I'm not a big fan of the Storm, but it's in my review queue at the moment, so needs must) and my trusty Eee 701, which is currently running Ubuntu Eee. The 701 was, of course, the first netbook to hit the market, and the one that got people excited about the Netbook concept -- largely because it brought ultraportable computing to the masses at a $600 price point, which was pretty revolutionary.
Since then, though, the Netbook revolution has stalled, and I'd even say gone backwards somewhat. Netbook specifications have improved, it's true - although they've again hit a plateau, with everyone employing the same Intel processor, and artificially stalled at a 1GB memory platform, thanks to Microsoft refusing to licence XP for systems above 1GB. Why vendors aren't sticking to their Linux guns and releasing 2GB Netbooks, I have no idea.
More critically, however, the mild increase in specs has been matched by a large increase in price. Most new netbooks are now hitting between $700 and $1,000, twelve months after the release of the original Eees. It's possible to get a $400 netbook with a lot of shopping around, but these are mostly end of life units; everybody's playing in the high-cost deep end of the netbook pool.
Most tech categories get cheaper over time, but Netbooks are bucking this trend. Given the current economic climate, I'm not sure that's wise. They're also getting larger, and while the bigger keyboards that brings are a nice addition, the fact that they're bulkier doesn't go unnoticed either.
Meanwhile, Smartphones get smarter. As mentioned, I'm not that fond of the Storm so far - I think losing the keyboard that differentiated Blackberry from the crowd is a big mis-step on RIM's part - but there's no denying that it fills many of the roles that a Netbook can fill. And Smartphone prices are even, ahem, "smarter" than many netbooks, whether it's a zero-dollar down item like a Storm or iPhone 3G, or even a pre-purchased Android model like the Kogan Agora. There is, admittedly a race from the other side, with products like Vodafone's postpaid 3G version of the Dell Inspiron Mini taking a page out of the mobile playbook.
There are things I don't want to do on a Smartphone - like typing up this column, at least not yet - but the gap is getting ever shorter. If it gets much slimmer, will Netbooks have a future as a category at all?
Subscribe to Hydrapinion
|
|
Recent Posts
Trackback address for this post
Trackback URL (right click and copy shortcut/link location)
2 comments
The keyboard and display in netbooks are for some people indispensable. If Apple made an iPhone with a 10" display and a >90% keyboard, I would look real hard at it. (I wouldn't buy it, because it would cost $800 American.)
Its really a matter of what suits the individual...
Obviously, a phone is more of a priority than a netbook to most people, but having a netbook allows one to get a more baseline phone, and use the DUN modem as required from the netbook.
The problem with smart phones as a replacement for a 'mobile workstation' is that they arent really very powerful... a netbook, although not as powerful notbook, can still get the job done, whatever it may be, however long it may take...
Netbooks have the advantage of fully flexible and customisable OS's, just look at ubuntu netbook remix, forget windows... ubuntu is an extremely capable operating system these days - (ok, so a day on the forums may be required to get things the way you like)
Smart phones are still a long way from having an operating system as flexible and as capable ubuntu (Credit to Google! but its early days for android)
Also,
The atom processor is a 900Mhz celeron equivalent (actually a 1.6Ghz inline archiecture, capable of processing 2 threads) , but correct me if im wrong, mobiles are still sitting around the 500Mhz mark and they basicly suck for anything heavy-duty. Any increase is going to really start to sap battery life from them making them less practical as an 'always on' device (as the telephone should be).
Plus,
What say HP, Dell, Asus, Acer get up the guts to release linux/ubuntu based netbooks with increased RAM and Dualcore Atoms. This power would be a long reach from the likes of a mobile.
Then what about storage? a 2.5"drive flash, or otherwise is likely to be the size of a smart phone anyway.
What about batteries?
How many times can you charge your phone off a netbook battery?
What about power?
how many solar panels can you fit on the lid of your laptop as opposed to your phone?
Also, netbooks may need a bag, we can put other usefull things in there! like more batteries, chargers, etc.
Regarding keyboards - i can touch type on my netbook, i can't on my smartphone
Touch-screens are also comming soon!
I think they complement each other.
Netbooks have a way to go before you could write them off.
Subscribe to Hydrapinion
Life wasn't meant to be spent sitting still. You're meant to get out in the world and to do that you've got to be able to carry your tech. Anthony Caruana's been hooked on portable computers and mobile comms since before PDAs existed. Writing for some of the most respected tech titles, he focuses on getting the most from the tech you can carry about.